Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Data Centers and ASN Report

Compare Solana validator stake by canonical data center provider, autonomous system number, and network organization aliases.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Jul 02, 2026, 01:49 AM UTC

Network operators

79

31.9%

Autonomous systems

90

31.9%

Top data center

31.9%

TeraSwitch Networks

31.9%

Geolocated

730/733

100%

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

-

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

-

Vote transactions

-

Performance rows

-

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

159 validators

24.4%
02

Netherlands

112 validators

20.6%
03

United States

146 validators

14.3%
0413.3%
05

Japan

74 validators

5.9%
06

Singapore

58 validators

4.8%
07

Canada

19 validators

4.5%
08

Lithuania

14 validators

4.3%
09

Sweden

10 validators

1.7%
10

Ireland

7 validators

1.7%
11

France

13 validators

1%
120.9%
13

Brazil

17 validators

0.6%
140.5%
15

Poland

8 validators

0.3%
16

Czechia

3 validators

0.3%
17

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
19

Norway

4 validators

0.1%
20

Russia

4 validators

0.1%
21

Spain

1 validators

0.1%
22

Romania

3 validators

0.1%
23

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
24

Argentina

2 validators

0%
25

Mexico

1 validators

0%
260%
27

Luxembourg

1 validators

0%
28

Latvia

2 validators

0%
29

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
30

Finland

2 validators

0%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

100 validators

31.9%
02

Latitude.sh

120 validators

10.5%
03

UAB Cherry Servers

73 validators

9.4%
04

OVH SAS

36 validators

6%
05

Amazon.com

7 validators

5.6%
06

ALLNODES

73 validators

5.1%
07

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.6%
08

Helius

1 validators

3.7%
09

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

2.9%
102.8%
11

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.4%
12

Datacamp Limited

9 validators

1.8%
13

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
14

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

14 validators

1.6%
161%
19

Butterfly Research

7 validators

0.6%
20

WebNX, Inc.

17 validators

0.6%
210.5%
22

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
230.3%
24

synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%
250.3%
26

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
27

23M GmbH

7 validators

0.2%
28

Decentra Cloud

11 validators

0.2%
29

FiberState, LLC

4 validators

0.2%
300.2%

Top autonomous systems

ASN-level stake concentration after provider alias normalization.

0-100%
01

AS20326 TeraSwitch Networks

100 validators

31.9%
02

AS396356 Latitude.sh

98 validators

8.3%
03

AS16276 OVH SAS

36 validators

6%
04

AS395201 ALLNODES

73 validators

5.1%
05

AS7979 Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.6%
06

AS16125 UAB Cherry Servers

14 validators

4.3%
07

AS399460 Helius

1 validators

3.7%
08

AS400963 Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

2.9%
09

AS14618 Amazon.com

1 validators

2.9%
10

AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC

73 validators

2.8%
11

AS16509 Amazon.com

6 validators

2.7%
12

AS1072 Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.4%
13

AS262287 Latitude.sh

22 validators

2.2%
14

AS60068 Datacamp Limited

9 validators

1.8%
15

AS9002 RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
16

AS214159 UAB Cherry Servers

9 validators

1.7%
17

AS29802 HIVELOCITY, Inc.

14 validators

1.6%
18

AS29066 velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

1.6%
19

AS59642 UAB Cherry Servers

9 validators

1.4%
20

AS204770 UAB Cherry Servers

15 validators

1.3%
21

AS206264 Amarutu Technology Ltd

30 validators

1%
22

AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

4 validators

0.8%
23

AS214783 Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

10 validators

0.7%
24

AS3402 Butterfly Research

7 validators

0.6%
25

AS18450 WebNX, Inc.

17 validators

0.6%
26

AS57043 HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
27

AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%
28

AS44486 synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%
29

AS200871 RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

3 validators

0.3%
30

AS46475 Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0.3%

Data center ranking

Provider aliases are normalized before grouping; the ASN view keeps AS-level rows separate.

01

Key signal

Provider normalization

Raw network organization labels are grouped into canonical providers so TeraSwitch, Cherry Servers, and similar aliases are counted together.

02

Key signal

ASN concentration

Autonomous system rankings show where stake is concentrated at the routing and network ownership layer.

03

Key signal

Infrastructure risk

Provider and ASN views make it easier to spot dependencies that are not visible from country or city labels alone.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, validators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator data center providers, ASNs, and raw network organization aliases in one current ranking.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions starts from Solana Gossip network organization metadata, extracts AS numbers when present, and applies provider aliases before ranking by validator count or active stake. Validators.app is used as an audit reference, not as an upstream dependency.

03

How operators use it

Infrastructure teams can use the provider view to avoid excessive reliance on one hosting group, then switch to ASN ranking to inspect routing-layer concentration.