Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Data Centers and ASN Report

Compare Solana validator stake by canonical data center provider, autonomous system number, and network organization aliases.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Jul 22, 2026, 06:07 AM UTC

Network operators

77

27.1%

Autonomous systems

88

27.1%

Top data center

27.1%

TeraSwitch Networks

27.1%

Geolocated

712/715

100%

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

-

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

-

Vote transactions

-

Performance rows

-

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

169 validators

26.8%
02

Netherlands

112 validators

19.5%
03

United States

139 validators

15.5%
0411.6%
05

Japan

65 validators

5.6%
06

Canada

18 validators

4.7%
07

Singapore

53 validators

4.6%
08

Lithuania

15 validators

4.6%
09

Sweden

12 validators

1.9%
10

Ireland

7 validators

1.4%
110.6%
12

Brazil

16 validators

0.5%
130.5%
14

France

12 validators

0.4%
150.3%
16

Czechia

4 validators

0.3%
17

Poland

7 validators

0.2%
18

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
19

Spain

3 validators

0.2%
20

Norway

4 validators

0.1%
21

Russia

4 validators

0.1%
22

Mexico

2 validators

0.1%
23

Romania

3 validators

0.1%
24

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
25

Argentina

2 validators

0%
26

Luxembourg

1 validators

0%
27

Latvia

2 validators

0%
28

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
29

Finland

2 validators

0%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

93 validators

27.1%
02

UAB Cherry Servers

75 validators

12.7%
03

Latitude.sh

117 validators

11%
04

ALLNODES

73 validators

6.7%
05

OVH SAS

36 validators

6.1%
06

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.9%
07

Amazon.com

6 validators

4.4%
08

Helius

2 validators

3.9%
09

Galaxy Digital LP

4 validators

3%
102.6%
11

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.4%
12

Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1.9%
13

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
14

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

12 validators

1.4%
151.2%
180.8%
20

Butterfly Research

7 validators

0.6%
21

WebNX, Inc.

16 validators

0.6%
22

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
230.3%
240.3%
25

synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%
260.3%
27

23M GmbH

7 validators

0.2%
28

Decentra Cloud

11 validators

0.2%
29

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
300.2%

Top autonomous systems

ASN-level stake concentration after provider alias normalization.

0-100%
01

AS20326 TeraSwitch Networks

93 validators

27.1%
02

AS396356 Latitude.sh

97 validators

8.8%
03

AS395201 ALLNODES

73 validators

6.7%
04

AS16276 OVH SAS

36 validators

6.1%
05

AS7979 Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.9%
06

AS16125 UAB Cherry Servers

15 validators

4.6%
07

AS399460 Helius

2 validators

3.9%
08

AS213896 UAB Cherry Servers

17 validators

3.3%
09

AS400963 Galaxy Digital LP

4 validators

3%
10

AS14618 Amazon.com

1 validators

2.9%
11

AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC

71 validators

2.6%
12

AS1072 Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.4%
13

AS262287 Latitude.sh

20 validators

2.2%
14

AS59642 UAB Cherry Servers

11 validators

2%
15

AS214159 UAB Cherry Servers

11 validators

1.9%
16

AS60068 Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1.9%
17

AS9002 RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
18

AS16509 Amazon.com

5 validators

1.6%
19

AS29802 HIVELOCITY, Inc.

12 validators

1.4%
20

AS46475 Limestone Networks, Inc.

4 validators

1.2%
21

AS29066 velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

1%
22

AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

0.9%
23

AS206264 Amarutu Technology Ltd

29 validators

0.8%
24

AS214783 Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

8 validators

0.7%
25

AS3402 Butterfly Research

7 validators

0.6%
26

AS18450 WebNX, Inc.

16 validators

0.6%
27

AS204770 UAB Cherry Servers

13 validators

0.5%
28

AS57043 HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
29

AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%
30

AS9318 SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0.3%

Data center ranking

Provider aliases are normalized before grouping; the ASN view keeps AS-level rows separate.

RankProviderASNsPopulationDelinquentActive stake
01

Key signal

Provider normalization

Raw network organization labels are grouped into canonical providers so TeraSwitch, Cherry Servers, and similar aliases are counted together.

02

Key signal

ASN concentration

Autonomous system rankings show where stake is concentrated at the routing and network ownership layer.

03

Key signal

Infrastructure risk

Provider and ASN views make it easier to spot dependencies that are not visible from country or city labels alone.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, validators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator data center providers, ASNs, and raw network organization aliases in one current ranking.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions starts from Solana Gossip network organization metadata, extracts AS numbers when present, and applies provider aliases before ranking by validator count or active stake.

03

How operators use it

Infrastructure teams can use the provider view to avoid excessive reliance on one hosting group, then switch to ASN ranking to inspect routing-layer concentration.