Validators Solutions

Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Countries Report

Explore Solana validator country and city distribution, network operator concentration, and geographic decentralization context.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Nov 05, 2026, 04:27 PM UTC

Countries

28

35.2%

Cities

80

26.1%

Network operators

73

26.8%

Geolocated

680/694

97%

97%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading ยท updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 200 ms ยท epoch - complete

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled ยท - skipped ยท skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

190 validators

35.2%
02

Netherlands

127 validators

19.8%
03

United States

114 validators

14.9%
04

United Kingdom

29 validators

5.7%
05

Japan

52 validators

5.2%
06

Lithuania

17 validators

4.7%
07

Singapore

43 validators

4%
08

Sweden

12 validators

2.1%
09

Ireland

7 validators

1.2%
10

Hong Kong SAR China

18 validators

0.7%
11

Canada

13 validators

0.7%
12

France

12 validators

0.6%
13

South Korea

1 validators

0.6%
14

Brazil

13 validators

0.4%
15

Poland

7 validators

0.3%
16

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
17

Norway

4 validators

0.2%
18

Mexico

3 validators

0.1%
19

Romania

2 validators

0.1%
20

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
21

Russia

2 validators

0.1%
22

Ukraine

2 validators

0.1%
23

Argentina

1 validators

0%
24

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
25

Latvia

2 validators

0%
26

Spain

1 validators

0%
27

Finland

2 validators

0%
28

Czechia

1 validators

0%

Top cities by stake

City-level clusters that can affect infrastructure diversity.

0-100%
01

Frankfurt am Main

111 validators

26.1%
02

Amsterdam

93 validators

15.6%
03

London

22 validators

5.3%
04

Tokyo

50 validators

5.2%
05

ล iauliai

17 validators

4.7%
06

Singapore

43 validators

4%
07

Offenbach

36 validators

3.7%
08

Ashburn

5 validators

3.6%
09

Eschborn

35 validators

2.5%
10

New York City

18 validators

2.5%
11

Lelystad

8 validators

2.4%
12

Stockholm

12 validators

2.1%
13

Munich

4 validators

1.9%
14

Los Angeles

11 validators

1.7%
15

Newark

9 validators

1.6%
16

Boardman

1 validators

1.3%
17

Chicago

24 validators

1.2%
18

Crumlin

4 validators

1.1%
19

Rรผsselsheim am Main

1 validators

0.8%
20

Woerden

7 validators

0.7%
21

Rotterdam

10 validators

0.6%
22

Sterling

2 validators

0.6%
23

Hwaseong-si

1 validators

0.6%
24

Ogden

11 validators

0.5%
25

Tsuen Wan

13 validators

0.5%
26

Beauharnois

4 validators

0.4%
27

Erith

5 validators

0.4%
28

Sรฃo Paulo

13 validators

0.4%
29

Secaucus

1 validators

0.4%
30

Gravelines

3 validators

0.3%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

104 validators

26.8%
02

Latitude.sh

107 validators

16%
03

UAB Cherry Servers

88 validators

13.9%
04

ALLNODES

77 validators

8%
05

Servers.com, Inc.

21 validators

5.5%
06

Amazon.com

6 validators

4.6%
07

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

2.8%
08

OVH SAS

34 validators

2.5%
09

Staking Facilities GmbH

3 validators

1.9%
10

Datacamp Limited

8 validators

1.8%
11

The Constant Company, LLC

38 validators

1.8%
12

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

20 validators

1.7%
13

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

1.3%
14

Amarutu Technology Ltd

22 validators

0.8%
15

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

11 validators

0.6%
16

WebNX, Inc.

15 validators

0.6%
17

Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0.6%
18

SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0.6%
19

Decentra Cloud

13 validators

0.5%
20

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

11 validators

0.4%
21

synlinq.de

12 validators

0.3%
22

Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%
23

Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0.3%
24

Butterfly Research

3 validators

0.3%
25

ReliableSite.Net LLC

5 validators

0.3%
26

Momentum Telecom, Inc.

2 validators

0.2%
27

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
28

Arelion Sweden AB

2 validators

0.2%
29

ServeTheWorld AS

4 validators

0.2%
30

23M GmbH

4 validators

0.1%
01

Key signal

Country distribution

Country-level aggregation shows where validators and active stake are visibly concentrated across the network.

02

Key signal

City clusters

City and region clusters help separate healthy geographic presence from excessive reliance on a few locations.

03

Key signal

Network operators

Organization and ASN-style metadata adds another layer beyond country names when evaluating infrastructure diversity.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator countries, city concentration, and infrastructure diversity. Use the live validator table to filter the current country, region, city, and network rows.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions uses Solana Gossip and vote-account context to attach country, region, city, version, and network organization metadata to validator rows. Unknown or low-confidence locations should be treated carefully rather than turned into separate indexable pages.

03

How operators use it

Delegators can use geography to support underrepresented regions. RPC, stream, and application teams can use it to reason about placement, route quality, and whether infrastructure decisions are too dependent on one country, city, or network operator.