Validators Solutions

Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Countries Report

Explore Solana validator country and city distribution, network operator concentration, and geographic decentralization context.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Jul 22, 2026, 06:07 AM UTC

Countries

30

26.8%

Cities

89

21.2%

Network operators

77

27.1%

Geolocated

712/715

100%

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

-

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

-

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

-

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

-

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

-

Window

-

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

-

Vote transactions

-

Performance rows

-

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%
01

Germany

169 validators

26.8%
02

Netherlands

112 validators

19.5%
03

United States

139 validators

15.5%
04

United Kingdom

34 validators

11.6%
05

Japan

65 validators

5.6%
06

Canada

18 validators

4.7%
07

Singapore

53 validators

4.6%
08

Lithuania

15 validators

4.6%
09

Sweden

12 validators

1.9%
10

Ireland

7 validators

1.4%
11

Hong Kong SAR China

18 validators

0.6%
12

Brazil

16 validators

0.5%
13

Switzerland

1 validators

0.5%
14

France

12 validators

0.4%
15

South Korea

1 validators

0.3%
16

Czechia

4 validators

0.3%
17

Poland

7 validators

0.2%
18

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%
19

Spain

3 validators

0.2%
20

Norway

4 validators

0.1%
21

Russia

4 validators

0.1%
22

Mexico

2 validators

0.1%
23

Romania

3 validators

0.1%
24

Austria

1 validators

0.1%
25

Argentina

2 validators

0%
26

Luxembourg

1 validators

0%
27

Latvia

2 validators

0%
28

Bulgaria

1 validators

0%
29

Finland

2 validators

0%
30

United Arab Emirates

1 validators

0%

Top cities by stake

City-level clusters that can affect infrastructure diversity.

0-100%
01

Frankfurt am Main

106 validators

21.2%
02

Amsterdam

67 validators

14.4%
03

London

26 validators

11.2%
04

Singapore

53 validators

4.6%
05

Šiauliai

15 validators

4.6%
06

Lelystad

27 validators

4.2%
07

Toronto

11 validators

4.1%
08

Ashburn

6 validators

3%
09

Los Angeles

23 validators

2.8%
10

Offenbach

33 validators

2.3%
11

New York City

16 validators

2.3%
12

Eschborn

24 validators

2.2%
13

Ebara

8 validators

2%
14

Stockholm

12 validators

1.9%
15

Tokyo

51 validators

1.8%
16

Monzen-nakachō

3 validators

1.8%
17

Newark

10 validators

1.6%
18

Boardman

1 validators

1.3%
19

Crumlin

4 validators

1.2%
20

Chicago

22 validators

1.2%
21

Rüsselsheim am Main

1 validators

0.8%
22

Sterling

4 validators

0.8%
23

Beauharnois

7 validators

0.6%
24

São Paulo

16 validators

0.5%
25

Zürich

1 validators

0.5%
26

Woerden

5 validators

0.5%
27

Leesburg

1 validators

0.4%
28

Salt Lake City

8 validators

0.3%
29

San Jose

1 validators

0.3%
30

Hwaseong-si

1 validators

0.3%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

93 validators

27.1%
02

UAB Cherry Servers

75 validators

12.7%
03

Latitude.sh

117 validators

11%
04

ALLNODES

73 validators

6.7%
05

OVH SAS

36 validators

6.1%
06

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.9%
07

Amazon.com

6 validators

4.4%
08

Helius

2 validators

3.9%
09

Galaxy Digital LP

4 validators

3%
10

The Constant Company, LLC

71 validators

2.6%
11

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.4%
12

Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1.9%
13

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%
14

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

12 validators

1.4%
15

Limestone Networks, Inc.

4 validators

1.2%
16

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

1%
17

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

0.9%
18

Amarutu Technology Ltd

29 validators

0.8%
19

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

8 validators

0.7%
20

Butterfly Research

7 validators

0.6%
21

WebNX, Inc.

16 validators

0.6%
22

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%
23

Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%
24

SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0.3%
25

synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%
26

RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

5 validators

0.3%
27

23M GmbH

7 validators

0.2%
28

Decentra Cloud

11 validators

0.2%
29

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%
30

ReliableSite.Net LLC

3 validators

0.2%
01

Key signal

Country distribution

Country-level aggregation shows where validators and active stake are visibly concentrated across the network.

02

Key signal

City clusters

City and region clusters help separate healthy geographic presence from excessive reliance on a few locations.

03

Key signal

Network operators

Organization and ASN-style metadata adds another layer beyond country names when evaluating infrastructure diversity.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator countries, city concentration, and infrastructure diversity. Use the live validator table to filter the current country, region, city, and network rows.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions uses Solana Gossip and vote-account context to attach country, region, city, version, and network organization metadata to validator rows. Unknown or low-confidence locations should be treated carefully rather than turned into separate indexable pages.

03

How operators use it

Delegators can use geography to support underrepresented regions. RPC, stream, and application teams can use it to reason about placement, route quality, and whether infrastructure decisions are too dependent on one country, city, or network operator.