Solana validator network report

Solana Validator Countries Report

Explore Solana validator country and city distribution, network operator concentration, and geographic decentralization context.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated Jun 21, 2026, 04:59 AM UTC

Countries

27.9%

Cities

23.4%

Network operators

34.7%

Geolocated

729/729

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and SOL context in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and Price API history to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingPrice API loadingperformance loading

Current slot

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

SOL/USD

24h - · confidence -

Leader production sample

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

Window

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

Vote transactions

Performance rows

Price source

SOL 24h context

-

waiting

Chart warming

Low

High

Top countries by stake

Country-level stake concentration across geolocated validators.

0-100%

Germany

156 validators

27.9%

Netherlands

116 validators

21.8%

United States

144 validators

15.6%

United Kingdom

33 validators

Japan

80 validators

6.4%

Singapore

56 validators

4.6%

Lithuania

17 validators

4.5%

Canada

18 validators

4.4%

Sweden

10 validators

1.7%

France

13 validators

Hong Kong SAR China

22 validators

0.8%

Ireland

6 validators

0.7%

Brazil

17 validators

0.6%

Switzerland

1 validators

0.5%

Czechia

3 validators

0.3%

Poland

7 validators

0.3%

Slovakia

3 validators

0.2%

United Arab Emirates

1 validators

0.2%

Norway

4 validators

0.1%

Mexico

2 validators

0.1%

Spain

1 validators

0.1%

Russia

4 validators

0.1%

Romania

3 validators

0.1%

Argentina

2 validators

0.1%

Austria

1 validators

0.1%

South Korea

1 validators

Luxembourg

1 validators

Latvia

2 validators

Bulgaria

1 validators

Finland

2 validators

Top cities by stake

City-level clusters that can affect infrastructure diversity.

0-100%

Frankfurt am Main

97 validators

23.4%

Amsterdam

74 validators

16.5%

London

25 validators

7.6%

Lelystad

30 validators

4.9%

Singapore

56 validators

4.6%

Šiauliai

17 validators

4.5%

Toronto

14 validators

4.3%

Ashburn

5 validators

3.1%

Tokyo

65 validators

2.4%

New York City

13 validators

2.3%

Ebara

9 validators

2.2%

Offenbach

35 validators

2.2%

Chicago

23 validators

1.9%

Newark

11 validators

1.8%

Monzen-nakachō

3 validators

1.8%

Stockholm

10 validators

1.7%

Los Angeles

24 validators

1.3%

Boardman

1 validators

1.3%

Eschborn

18 validators

1.2%

Rüsselsheim am Main

1 validators

0.8%

Sterling

4 validators

0.8%

Crumlin

3 validators

0.6%

Aubervilliers

4 validators

0.6%

São Paulo

16 validators

0.5%

Zürich

1 validators

0.5%

Leesburg

2 validators

0.5%

Tung Chung

10 validators

0.4%

Salt Lake City

10 validators

0.4%

San Jose

1 validators

0.3%

Prague

3 validators

0.3%

Top network operators

Network organization concentration beyond country and city labels.

0-100%

TeraSwitch Networks

97 validators

34.7%

UAB Cherry Servers

80 validators

12.1%

Latitude.sh

116 validators

7.7%

Amazon.com

8 validators

6.3%

ALLNODES

71 validators

5.6%

OVH SAS

32 validators

5.5%

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4.6%

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3.1%

The Constant Company, LLC

76 validators

2.8%

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2.3%

Datacamp Limited

12 validators

1.9%

RETN Limited

2 validators

1.7%

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

15 validators

1.6%

Amarutu Technology Ltd

32 validators

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

10 validators

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

4 validators

0.8%

Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0.7%

WebNX, Inc.

19 validators

0.7%

Butterfly Research

7 validators

0.7%

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

9 validators

0.6%

RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

4 validators

0.5%

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0.5%

synlinq.de

9 validators

0.3%

Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0.3%

23M GmbH

8 validators

0.3%

Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0.2%

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0.2%

Decentra Cloud

9 validators

0.2%

FiberState, LLC

4 validators

0.2%

ReliableSite.Net LLC

3 validators

0.1%

Key signal

Country distribution

Country-level aggregation shows where validators and active stake are visibly concentrated across the network.

Key signal

City clusters

City and region clusters help separate healthy geographic presence from excessive reliance on a few locations.

Key signal

Network operators

Organization and ASN-style metadata adds another layer beyond country names when evaluating infrastructure diversity.

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator countries, city concentration, and infrastructure diversity. Use the live validator table to filter the current country, region, city, and network rows.

How to read the data

Validators Solutions uses Solana Gossip and vote-account context to attach country, region, city, version, and network organization metadata to validator rows. Unknown or low-confidence locations should be treated carefully rather than turned into separate indexable pages.

How operators use it

Delegators can use geography to support underrepresented regions. RPC, stream, and application teams can use it to reason about placement, route quality, and whether infrastructure decisions are too dependent on one country, city, or network operator.