Validators Solutions

Solana-validatornetwerkrapport

Solana Validator Data Centers and ASN Report

Compare Solana validator stake by canonical data center provider, autonomous system number, and network organization aliases.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated 18 mei 2026, 07:28 UTC

Netwerkoperators

85

33,3%

Autonomous systems

92

30,1%

Top data center

33,3%

TeraSwitch Networks

33,3%

Geolocatie

762/771

100%

100%

Toplanden op stake

Stakeconcentratie per land voor validators met bekende locatie.

0-100%
01

Duitsland

159 validators

24,8%
02

Nederland

128 validators

22,6%
03

Verenigde Staten

146 validators

15,1%
04

Verenigd Koninkrijk

35 validators

6,7%
05

Japan

62 validators

5,6%
06

Litouwen

15 validators

4,4%
07

Canada

15 validators

4,3%
08

Singapore

61 validators

4,1%
09

Duitsland

13 validators

2,8%
10

Ierland

8 validators

2,5%
11

Zweden

5 validators

1%
12

Brazilië

31 validators

1%
13

Hongkong SAR van China

20 validators

0,8%
14

Frankrijk

9 validators

0,7%
15

Japan

3 validators

0,6%
16

Zweden

1 validators

0,6%
17

Zwitserland

1 validators

0,5%
18

Tsjechië

3 validators

0,3%
19

Spanje

4 validators

0,2%
20

Slowakije

3 validators

0,2%
21

Polen

6 validators

0,2%
22

Verenigde Arabische Emiraten

1 validators

0,2%
23

Mexico

5 validators

0,2%
24

Frankrijk

2 validators

0,1%
25

Noorwegen

3 validators

0,1%
26

Rusland

3 validators

0,1%
27

Roemenië

3 validators

0%
28

Oostenrijk

1 validators

0%
29

Argentinië

2 validators

0%
30

Hongkong SAR van China

1 validators

0%

Top netwerkoperators

Concentratie per netwerkorganisatie voorbij land- en stadlabels.

0-100%
01

TeraSwitch Networks

106 validators

33,3%
02

UAB Cherry Servers

65 validators

9,4%
03

Latitude.sh

127 validators

9,3%
04

ALLNODES

73 validators

6,7%
05

Amazon.com

8 validators

6,5%
06

OVH SAS

36 validators

6,4%
07

Servers.com, Inc.

20 validators

4,3%
08

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3,4%
09

The Constant Company, LLC

85 validators

3,2%
10

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2,2%
11

Datacamp Limited

11 validators

1,9%
12

RETN Limited

2 validators

1,7%
13

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

12 validators

1,5%
14

Amarutu Technology Ltd

40 validators

1,3%
15

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

10 validators

0,9%
16

WebNX, Inc.

26 validators

0,8%
17

Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0,7%
18

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

4 validators

0,7%
19

Butterfly Research

7 validators

0,5%
20

RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

3 validators

0,5%
21

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0,5%
22

synlinq.de

10 validators

0,3%
23

Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0,3%
24

Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0,3%
25

23M GmbH

8 validators

0,3%
26

GSL Networks Pty LTD

1 validators

0,2%
27

Cogent Communications, LLC

4 validators

0,2%
28

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

8 validators

0,2%
29

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0,2%
30

ReliableSite.Net LLC

3 validators

0,2%

Top autonomous systems

ASN-level stake concentration after provider alias normalization.

0-100%
01

AS20326 TeraSwitch Networks

99 validators

30,1%
02

AS396356 Latitude.sh

99 validators

6,7%
03

AS395201 ALLNODES

68 validators

6,6%
04

AS16276 OVH SAS

33 validators

6,2%
05

AS16125 UAB Cherry Servers

15 validators

4,4%
06

AS7979 Servers.com, Inc.

19 validators

4,2%
07

AS400963 Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3,4%
08

AS16509 Amazon.com

7 validators

3,4%
09

AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC

83 validators

3,1%
10

AS14618 Amazon.com

1 validators

3,1%
11

AS262287 Latitude.sh

23 validators

2,3%
12

AS1072 Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2,2%
13

AS60068 Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1,9%
14

AS59642 UAB Cherry Servers

13 validators

1,8%
15

AS9002 RETN Limited

2 validators

1,7%
16

AS29802 HIVELOCITY, Inc.

11 validators

1,5%
17

AS206264 Amarutu Technology Ltd

38 validators

1,2%
18

AS214159 UAB Cherry Servers

5 validators

1%
19

AS214434 Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0,7%
20

AS18450 WebNX, Inc.

24 validators

0,7%
21

AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

4 validators

0,7%
22

AS204770 UAB Cherry Servers

12 validators

0,5%
23

AS3402 Butterfly Research

7 validators

0,5%
24

AS57043 HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0,5%
25

AS44486 synlinq.de

10 validators

0,3%
26

AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0,3%
27

AS29066 velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

9 validators

0,3%
28

AS46475 Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0,3%
29

AS200871 RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

2 validators

0,3%
30

AS47447 23M GmbH

8 validators

0,3%

Data center ranking

Provider aliases are normalized before grouping; the ASN view keeps AS-level rows separate.

01

Rapportsignaal

Provider normalization

Raw network organization labels are grouped into canonical providers so TeraSwitch, Cherry Servers, and similar aliases are counted together.

02

Rapportsignaal

ASN concentration

Autonomous system rankings show where stake is concentrated at the routing and network ownership layer.

03

Rapportsignaal

Infrastructure risk

Provider and ASN views make it easier to spot dependencies that are not visible from country or city labels alone.

01

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, validators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator data center providers, ASNs, and raw network organization aliases in one current ranking.

02

How to read the data

Validators Solutions starts from Solana Gossip network organization metadata, extracts AS numbers when present, and applies provider aliases before ranking by validator count or active stake. Validators.app is used as an audit reference, not as an upstream dependency.

03

How operators use it

Infrastructure teams can use the provider view to avoid excessive reliance on one hosting group, then switch to ASN ranking to inspect routing-layer concentration.