Solana-validatornetwerkrapport

Solana-validatorrapport over datacenters en ASN's

Vergelijk Solana-validatorstake per canonieke datacenterprovider, autonoom systeemnummer (ASN) en netwerkorganisatie-aliassen.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated 22 jul 2026, 06:07 UTC

Netwerkoperators

27,1%

Autonomous systems

27,1%

Top data center

27,1%

TeraSwitch Networks

27,1%

Geolocatie

712/715

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

Window

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

Vote transactions

Performance rows

Toplanden op stake

Stakeconcentratie per land voor validators met bekende locatie.

0-100%

Duitsland

169 validators

26,8%

Nederland

112 validators

19,5%

Verenigde Staten

139 validators

15,5%

Verenigd Koninkrijk

34 validators

11,6%

Japan

65 validators

5,6%

Canada

18 validators

4,7%

Singapore

53 validators

4,6%

Litouwen

15 validators

4,6%

Zweden

12 validators

1,9%

Ierland

7 validators

1,4%

Hongkong SAR van China

18 validators

0,6%

Brazilië

16 validators

0,5%

Zwitserland

1 validators

0,5%

Frankrijk

12 validators

0,4%

Zuid-Korea

1 validators

0,3%

Tsjechië

4 validators

0,3%

Polen

7 validators

0,2%

Slowakije

3 validators

0,2%

Spanje

3 validators

0,2%

Noorwegen

4 validators

0,1%

Rusland

4 validators

0,1%

Mexico

2 validators

0,1%

Roemenië

3 validators

0,1%

Oostenrijk

1 validators

0,1%

Argentinië

2 validators

Luxemburg

1 validators

Letland

2 validators

Bulgarije

1 validators

Finland

2 validators

Verenigde Arabische Emiraten

1 validators

Top netwerkoperators

Concentratie per netwerkorganisatie voorbij land- en stadlabels.

0-100%

TeraSwitch Networks

93 validators

27,1%

UAB Cherry Servers

75 validators

12,7%

Latitude.sh

117 validators

11%

ALLNODES

73 validators

6,7%

OVH SAS

36 validators

6,1%

Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4,9%

Amazon.com

6 validators

4,4%

Helius

2 validators

3,9%

Galaxy Digital LP

4 validators

The Constant Company, LLC

71 validators

2,6%

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2,4%

Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1,9%

RETN Limited

2 validators

1,7%

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

12 validators

1,4%

Limestone Networks, Inc.

4 validators

1,2%

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

0,9%

Amarutu Technology Ltd

29 validators

0,8%

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

8 validators

0,7%

Butterfly Research

7 validators

0,6%

WebNX, Inc.

16 validators

0,6%

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0,5%

Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0,3%

SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0,3%

synlinq.de

9 validators

0,3%

RockawayX Infra s.r.o.

5 validators

0,3%

23M GmbH

7 validators

0,2%

Decentra Cloud

11 validators

0,2%

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0,2%

ReliableSite.Net LLC

3 validators

0,2%

Top autonomous systems

ASN-level stake concentration after provider alias normalization.

0-100%

AS20326 TeraSwitch Networks

93 validators

27,1%

AS396356 Latitude.sh

97 validators

8,8%

AS395201 ALLNODES

73 validators

6,7%

AS16276 OVH SAS

36 validators

6,1%

AS7979 Servers.com, Inc.

24 validators

4,9%

AS16125 UAB Cherry Servers

15 validators

4,6%

AS399460 Helius

2 validators

3,9%

AS213896 UAB Cherry Servers

17 validators

3,3%

AS400963 Galaxy Digital LP

4 validators

AS14618 Amazon.com

1 validators

2,9%

AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC

71 validators

2,6%

AS1072 Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2,4%

AS262287 Latitude.sh

20 validators

2,2%

AS59642 UAB Cherry Servers

11 validators

AS214159 UAB Cherry Servers

11 validators

1,9%

AS60068 Datacamp Limited

10 validators

1,9%

AS9002 RETN Limited

2 validators

1,7%

AS16509 Amazon.com

5 validators

1,6%

AS29802 HIVELOCITY, Inc.

12 validators

1,4%

AS46475 Limestone Networks, Inc.

4 validators

1,2%

AS29066 velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

12 validators

AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

0,9%

AS206264 Amarutu Technology Ltd

29 validators

0,8%

AS214783 Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

8 validators

0,7%

AS3402 Butterfly Research

7 validators

0,6%

AS18450 WebNX, Inc.

16 validators

0,6%

AS204770 UAB Cherry Servers

13 validators

0,5%

AS57043 HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0,5%

AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC

1 validators

0,3%

AS9318 SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0,3%

Data center ranking

Provider aliases are normalized before grouping; the ASN view keeps AS-level rows separate.

Rank	Provider	ASNs	Population	Delinquent	Active stake

Belangrijkste signaal

Provider normalization

Raw network organization labels are grouped into canonical providers so TeraSwitch, Cherry Servers, and similar aliases are counted together.

Belangrijkste signaal

ASN concentration

Autonomous system rankings show where stake is concentrated at the routing and network ownership layer.

Belangrijkste signaal

Infrastructure risk

Provider and ASN views make it easier to spot dependencies that are not visible from country or city labels alone.

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, validators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator data center providers, ASNs, and raw network organization aliases in one current ranking.

How to read the data

Validators Solutions vertrekt vanuit de organisatiemetadata van het Solana Gossip-netwerk, extraheert AS-nummers waar aanwezig en past provider-aliassen toe voordat er wordt gerangschikt op aantal validators of actieve stake.

How operators use it

Infrastructure teams can use the provider view to avoid excessive reliance on one hosting group, then switch to ASN ranking to inspect routing-layer concentration.