Solana-validatornetwerkrapport

Solana-validatorrapport over datacenters en ASN's

Vergelijk Solana-validatorstake per canonieke datacenterprovider, autonoom systeemnummer (ASN) en netwerkorganisatie-aliassen.

Data source

Solana Gossip + vote accounts

Updated 28 sep 2026, 09:41 UTC

Netwerkoperators

29,7%

Autonomous systems

29,7%

Top data center

29,7%

TeraSwitch Networks

29,7%

Geolocatie

681/683

100%

Network intelligence

Network state, leader timing, and validator evidence in one report.

This panel adds live slot context, leader-window evidence, validator performance rows, and production samples to the existing reports without pretending unsupported data is already resolved.

leader window loadingperformance loading

Current slot

Leader feed loading · updated waiting

Observed slot time

Target 400 ms · epoch - complete

Transaction sample

- non-vote · - vote

Leader production sample

- scheduled · - skipped · skip -

Leader now

Resolving leader

Waiting for leader window

Slot

Window

Next different leader

Waiting for next leader group

Network activity evidence

Non-vote transactions

Vote transactions

Performance rows

Toplanden op stake

Stakeconcentratie per land voor validators met bekende locatie.

0-100%

Duitsland

187 validators

34,9%

Nederland

123 validators

19,3%

Verenigde Staten

119 validators

14,8%

Verenigd Koninkrijk

35 validators

9,6%

Japan

53 validators

5,6%

Litouwen

16 validators

4,4%

Singapore

48 validators

4,3%

Zweden

10 validators

1,9%

Ierland

6 validators

1,3%

Canada

12 validators

0,6%

Hongkong SAR van China

14 validators

0,6%

Zwitserland

1 validators

0,5%

Frankrijk

10 validators

0,4%

Brazilië

13 validators

0,3%

Zuid-Korea

1 validators

0,3%

Polen

8 validators

0,3%

Slowakije

3 validators

0,2%

Noorwegen

3 validators

0,1%

Mexico

2 validators

0,1%

Spanje

1 validators

0,1%

Albanië

2 validators

0,1%

Roemenië

2 validators

0,1%

Oostenrijk

1 validators

0,1%

Luxemburg

1 validators

Rusland

2 validators

Letland

2 validators

Argentinië

1 validators

Bulgarije

1 validators

Tsjechië

1 validators

Oekraïne

1 validators

Top netwerkoperators

Concentratie per netwerkorganisatie voorbij land- en stadlabels.

0-100%

TeraSwitch Networks

98 validators

29,7%

UAB Cherry Servers

84 validators

13,1%

Latitude.sh

110 validators

12,3%

ALLNODES

78 validators

OVH SAS

32 validators

6,2%

Servers.com, Inc.

20 validators

4,7%

Amazon.com

6 validators

4,3%

Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3,2%

Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2,9%

The Constant Company, LLC

47 validators

1,9%

Datacamp Limited

8 validators

1,8%

RETN Limited

2 validators

1,6%

Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

17 validators

1,5%

Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

1,2%

velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

11 validators

0,9%

HIVELOCITY, Inc.

10 validators

0,7%

Amarutu Technology Ltd

24 validators

0,7%

Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0,6%

WebNX, Inc.

15 validators

0,6%

HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0,5%

Decentra Cloud

13 validators

0,5%

Hurricane Electric LLC

2 validators

0,3%

synlinq.de

11 validators

0,3%

SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0,3%

Limestone Networks, Inc.

2 validators

0,3%

Butterfly Research

3 validators

0,2%

VNET a.s.

3 validators

0,2%

Momentum Telecom, Inc.

2 validators

0,2%

23M GmbH

7 validators

0,2%

Arelion Sweden AB

3 validators

0,2%

Top autonomous systems

ASN-level stake concentration after provider alias normalization.

0-100%

AS20326 TeraSwitch Networks

98 validators

29,7%

AS396356 Latitude.sh

91 validators

10,1%

AS395201 ALLNODES

78 validators

AS16276 OVH SAS

32 validators

6,2%

AS7979 Servers.com, Inc.

20 validators

4,7%

AS16125 UAB Cherry Servers

16 validators

4,4%

AS213896 UAB Cherry Servers

21 validators

3,5%

AS400963 Galaxy Digital LP

5 validators

3,2%

AS1072 Payward, Inc.

2 validators

2,9%

AS14618 Amazon.com

1 validators

2,8%

AS262287 Latitude.sh

19 validators

2,2%

AS59642 UAB Cherry Servers

16 validators

2,2%

AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC

47 validators

1,9%

AS214159 UAB Cherry Servers

10 validators

1,9%

AS60068 Datacamp Limited

8 validators

1,8%

AS9002 RETN Limited

2 validators

1,6%

AS214783 Danny Nieuwenhuis trading as DedicatedNodes

17 validators

1,5%

AS16509 Amazon.com

5 validators

1,5%

AS45102 Alibaba (US) Technology Co., Ltd.

3 validators

1,2%

AS29066 velia.net Internetdienste GmbH

11 validators

0,9%

AS29802 HIVELOCITY, Inc.

10 validators

0,7%

AS206264 Amarutu Technology Ltd

24 validators

0,7%

AS214434 Twinstake Limited

1 validators

0,6%

AS18450 WebNX, Inc.

15 validators

0,6%

AS204770 UAB Cherry Servers

12 validators

0,5%

AS57043 HOSTKEY B.V.

1 validators

0,5%

AS402479 Decentra Cloud

13 validators

0,5%

AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC

2 validators

0,3%

AS44486 synlinq.de

11 validators

0,3%

AS9318 SK Broadband Co Ltd

1 validators

0,3%

Data center ranking

Provider aliases are normalized before grouping; the ASN view keeps AS-level rows separate.

Rank	Provider	ASNs	Population	Delinquent	Active stake

Belangrijkste signaal

Provider normalization

Raw network organization labels are grouped into canonical providers so TeraSwitch, Cherry Servers, and similar aliases are counted together.

Belangrijkste signaal

ASN concentration

Autonomous system rankings show where stake is concentrated at the routing and network ownership layer.

Belangrijkste signaal

Infrastructure risk

Provider and ASN views make it easier to spot dependencies that are not visible from country or city labels alone.

What this report answers

This page helps delegators, validators, RPC teams, and researchers compare Solana validator data center providers, ASNs, and raw network organization aliases in one current ranking.

How to read the data

Validators Solutions vertrekt vanuit de organisatiemetadata van het Solana Gossip-netwerk, extraheert AS-nummers waar aanwezig en past provider-aliassen toe voordat er wordt gerangschikt op aantal validators of actieve stake.

How operators use it

Infrastructure teams can use the provider view to avoid excessive reliance on one hosting group, then switch to ASN ranking to inspect routing-layer concentration.